Most fans agreed that at some point in a franchise’s run, it was time to stop making movies. u / Fishb20 summed up this position by writing: âNot everything needs to have a million installments over 40 years. The early films [of the “Nightmare on Elm Street” franchise] were good and they will always be there if you want to see them again. With 215 upvotes, a lot of fans subscribed.
In a response, u / chicagoredditer1 briefly moved the conversation away from the horror genre to illustrate the rarity of a long-running successful franchise. âOther than James Bond (and they certainly don’t have a flawless track record), nothing survives as long as these horror franchises try to do,â they wrote. Elsewhere, u / Dark_Side_of_Synth hilariously compared regular horror movie franchise payments to the woes of homeownership, writing, “THIS !!! Movies have become like mortgages these days. “
Still in keeping with the general sentiment, u / atfricks approached the conversation from a different angle by getting back to the core of what makes a great horror movie. They wrote: âThe biggest problem with horror franchises is that the scariest thing is always the unknown. The longer a horror franchise lasts, the more viewers get to know your big bad, the less it is. is scary. ” Ruining the unknown with new films also defeats the profit motive that drives the pursuit of these franchises, because as fans become less excited about new episodes, they will be less likely to go see them again. and again in theaters, hanging out their friends with them, or buying the accompanying merchandise.